From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrington v. Ciolli

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 19, 2021
Case No. 21-cv-00678-JCS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 21-cv-00678-JCS

04-19-2021

PERRY HARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. A CIOLLI, Defendant.


ORDER OF TRANSFER

In this federal habeas action, petitioner challenges his federal detention in Merced County, which lies in the Eastern District of California. While petitioner challenges the validity of his sentence, he does so under the "savings clause" of 28 U.S.C. § 2241 rather than under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Stephens v. Herrera, 464 F.3d 895, 898 (9th Cir. 2006) (federal prisoner may proceed under § 2241 if she "(1) makes a claim of actual innocence, and (2) has not had an unobstructed procedural shot at presenting that claim"). Accordingly, this action is TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). See Hernandez v. Campbell, 204 F.3d 861, 864-65 n.6 (9th Cir. 2000). The Clerk shall transfer this action forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 19, 2021

/s/_________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Chief Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Harrington v. Ciolli

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 19, 2021
Case No. 21-cv-00678-JCS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Harrington v. Ciolli

Case Details

Full title:PERRY HARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. A CIOLLI, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 19, 2021

Citations

Case No. 21-cv-00678-JCS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2021)