From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harriger v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 12, 2020
Case No. 20-12120 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 12, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 20-12120

08-12-2020

ARTHUR HARRIGER, Petitioner, v. WILLIS CHAPMAN, Respondent.


ORDER TRANSFERRING SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Michigan prisoner Arthur Harriger, ("Petitioner"), has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In 1991, Petitioner was convicted following a jury trial in the Luce Circuit Court of first-degree murder, MICH. COMP. LAWS § 750.316, and he was sentenced to life in prison.

In 2009, Petitioner filed a federal habeas petition in the Western District of Michigan challenging his state conviction. The Court dismissed the petition with prejudice because it was filed after expiration of the statute of limitations. Harriger v. Woods, Case No. 2:09-cv-191, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109201 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 23, 2009).

Petitioner's current petition constitutes his second bid for federal habeas corpus relief. Federal district courts lack jurisdiction to consider successive habeas petitions absent preauthorization from the court of appeals. Franklin v. Jenkins, 839 F.3d 465, 473 (6th Cir. 2016) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)); Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 664 (1996). When a habeas petitioner files a second or successive habeas petition in the district court without preauthorization, the district court must transfer the case to the court of appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631; Sims v. Terbush, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir. 1997).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall TRANSFER this case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1631 for a determination of whether Petitioner may file a successive petition. Dated: August 12, 2020

s/Thomas L. Ludington

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served Arthur Harriger #167717, THUMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 3225 JOHN CONLEY DRIVE, LAPEER, MI 48446 by first class U.S. mail on August 12, 2020.

s/Kelly Winslow

KELLY WINSLOW, Case Manager


Summaries of

Harriger v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 12, 2020
Case No. 20-12120 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 12, 2020)
Case details for

Harriger v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR HARRIGER, Petitioner, v. WILLIS CHAPMAN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 12, 2020

Citations

Case No. 20-12120 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 12, 2020)