From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrigan v. Bailey

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County
Apr 1, 2008
C.A. No. 07C-07-020 (THG) (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 1, 2008)

Opinion

C.A. No. 07C-07-020 (THG).

April 1, 2008.

H. Clay Davis, III, Esquire, Georgetown, DE.

Richard E. Berl, Jr., Esquire, Smith, O'Donnell, Procino Berl, Georgetown, DE.


Dear Counsel:

I have read your submissions in regard to the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.

It appears that matters of fraudulent intent are questions of fact. Since both parties disagree as to the "why" concerning the transfer of the real property, I can not grant summary judgment. Ebersole v. Lowengrub, 180 A.2d 467, 470 (Del. 1962).

Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harrigan v. Bailey

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County
Apr 1, 2008
C.A. No. 07C-07-020 (THG) (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 1, 2008)
Case details for

Harrigan v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:Harrigan v. Bailey

Court:Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County

Date published: Apr 1, 2008

Citations

C.A. No. 07C-07-020 (THG) (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 1, 2008)