From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrell v. Stephens

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 2, 2012
479 F. App'x 496 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6940

10-02-2012

DAVID HARRELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. D. R. STEPHENS, Respondent - Appellee.

David Harrell, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Dee Dannels, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:10-hc-02259-FL) Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Harrell, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Dee Dannels, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Harrell, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrell v. Stephens, No. 5:10-hc-02259-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2012; May 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Harrell v. Stephens

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 2, 2012
479 F. App'x 496 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Harrell v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HARRELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. D. R. STEPHENS, Respondent …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 2, 2012

Citations

479 F. App'x 496 (4th Cir. 2012)