From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrell v. State

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Sep 26, 2011
Memorandum Opinion No.  2011-MO-025 (S.C. Sep. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion No.  2011-MO-025

09-26-2011

David Harrell, Jr., Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Joshua Kendrick, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliot, and Assistant Attorney General Mary S. Williams, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI


Appeal from Dorchester County

Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge


DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Joshua Kendrick, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliot, and Assistant Attorney General Mary S. Williams, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : We granted a writ of certiorari to review the denial of Petitioner's application for post-conviction relief (PCR). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harrell v. State

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Sep 26, 2011
Memorandum Opinion No.  2011-MO-025 (S.C. Sep. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Harrell v. State

Case Details

Full title:David Harrell, Jr., Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Sep 26, 2011

Citations

Memorandum Opinion No.  2011-MO-025 (S.C. Sep. 26, 2011)