From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrell v. Simmons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 28, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-1838 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:19-cv-1838 TLN AC P

05-28-2020

JOSHUA NEIL HARRELL, Plaintiff, v. ANTUAN SIMMONS, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed April 27, 2020, plaintiff was given an additional fourteen days to pay the filing fee and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 19. The fourteen-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that //// failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: May 28, 2020

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Harrell v. Simmons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 28, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-1838 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Harrell v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA NEIL HARRELL, Plaintiff, v. ANTUAN SIMMONS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 28, 2020

Citations

No. 2:19-cv-1838 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2020)