From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrell v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1898
29 S.E. 56 (N.C. 1898)

Opinion

(Decided 22 February, 1898.)

Action for Damages — Permanent Injury to Land by Construction of Railroad — Statute of limitations.

1. Before the act of 1895 (chapter 224) a railroad could acquire the prescriptive right to pond water on adjacent lands only by subjecting itself to an action for the injury continuously for twenty years.

2. Chapter 224. Acts of 1895, reducing the time for bringing action against a railroad company for permanent injury to land, caused by the construction or repair of defendant's road, to five years, does not apply to a suit begun before its passage.

(823) Action to recover permanent damages for injury to plaintiff's land by the construction of defendant's railroad, tried before Brown, J., and a jury, at Fall Term, 1894, of GATES. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appealed.

L. L. Smith for plaintiff.

George Cowper for defendant.


This action, begun 26 September, 1894, is brought to recover damages by reason of defendant's construction of its road across plaintiff's land, and thereby backing water and sobbing his cleared land. The road was completed in 1889. The defendant urges that "all the injury" resulted simultaneously with the completion of its road, and that being so, the statute of limitations began to run from that time, and its only exception is that his Honor refused to so charge the jury.

The evidence is that the land has been all the time and still is sobbed with back-water. This question was decided in Nichols v. R. R., 120 N.C. 495, to which the profession is referred for the reason.

The action was for permanent damages. The Acts of 1895, ch. 224, was passed since this action was instituted.

Affirmed.

Cited: Ridley v. R. R., 124 N.C. 36.

(824)


Summaries of

Harrell v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1898
29 S.E. 56 (N.C. 1898)
Case details for

Harrell v. R. R

Case Details

Full title:W. R. HARRELL v. NORFOLK AND CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1898

Citations

29 S.E. 56 (N.C. 1898)
122 N.C. 822

Citing Cases

Valleytown Tp. v. Women's Catholic Order of F

See, also, Vanderbilt v. Atlantic Coast Line R.R. Co., 188 N.C. 568, 125 S.E. 387, 52 A.L.R. 287. In that…

Ridley v. R. R

The court below properly admitted proof of damages to crops for three years prior to action brought, and the…