Harrell v. Duran

Full title: MICHAEL A. HARRELL, Plaintiff v. WARDEN THOMAS DURAN, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 12, 2011

CIVIL NO. 1:CV-10-0663 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:CV-10-0663.

January 12, 2011

ORDER

WILLIAM CALDWELL, Senior District Judge

AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2011, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mannion, to which no objections were filed, and upon a review of the record, the Report is approved.

Pursuant to Judge Mannion's recommendations it is Ordered as follows:

1) Defendants' motion to dismiss the excessive force claims against defendants Maggs and Cain is denied.

2) Defendants' motion to dismiss the excessive force claim against defendant Boatman is granted.

3) Defendants' motion to dismiss the excessive force claim against defendants Duran and Motter is granted. The same is denied with respect to the issuance of retaliatory write-ups against plaintiff by said defendants.

4) Defendants' motion to dismiss, with respect to defendants Harkey, Klinger and Rigley, is granted.

5) Defendants' motion to dismiss claims against Duran, Motter and Boatman concerning plaintiff's grievance complaint arising from his excessive force claim, is granted.

6) Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is denied as moot.

Trial of plaintiff's excessive force claim against Maggs and Cain and his retaliatory claim, against defendants Duran and Motter, shall proceed to trial on the May 2011 trial list, scheduling order to follow.