From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrell v. Blankenship

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 4, 2018
Case No. ED CV 15-549-CJC (SP) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 15-549-CJC (SP)

05-04-2018

RONNIE KEITH HARRELL, Plaintiff, v. BLANKENSHIP, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 43) and plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 67) are both denied. DATED: May 4, 2018

/s/_________

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Harrell v. Blankenship

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 4, 2018
Case No. ED CV 15-549-CJC (SP) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2018)
Case details for

Harrell v. Blankenship

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE KEITH HARRELL, Plaintiff, v. BLANKENSHIP, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 4, 2018

Citations

Case No. ED CV 15-549-CJC (SP) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2018)