Harrell v. Blankenship

Full title: RONNIE KEITH HARRELL, Plaintiff, v. BLANKENSHIP, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 22, 2016

Case No. ED CV 15-549-CJC (SP) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 15-549-CJC (SP)

09-22-2016

RONNIE KEITH HARRELL, Plaintiff, v. BLANKENSHIP, Defendant.

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss is denied. Defendant is ordered to answer the Complaint within fourteen days of this Order. DATED: September 22, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE