From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrell, Chasing Crooks v. Schaffer

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Apr 14, 2005
No. 02-05-005-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2005)

Opinion

No. 02-05-005-CV

Delivered: April 14, 2005.

Appeal from the 96th District Court of Tarrant County.

Panel D: WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and McCOY, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On February 10, 2005, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the record as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the records and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Harrell, Chasing Crooks v. Schaffer

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Apr 14, 2005
No. 02-05-005-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2005)
Case details for

Harrell, Chasing Crooks v. Schaffer

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HARRELL AND CHASING CROOKS, INC. D/B/A HARRELL ASSOCIATES, Appellants…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Apr 14, 2005

Citations

No. 02-05-005-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2005)