Harral v. Martel

Full title: JOE GOLMAN HARRAL, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 30, 2011

ED CV 10-1379-AG (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2011)

Opinion

JOE GOLMAN HARRAL, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden, Respondent. No. ED CV 10-1379-AG (PLA) United States District Court, C.D. California, Eastern Division. April 30, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and the objections to the report and recommendation that have been filed herein. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

         ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

         1. The report and recommendation is adopted.

         2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.

         3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.