From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrah v. Bradford Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 6, 1994
37 F.3d 1493 (4th Cir. 1994)

Summary

In Harrah v. J.C. Bradford Co., 37 F.3d 1493, 1994 WL 543528 (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 1994), an individual convinced several investors to allow him to invest their money in stock options, guaranteeing them "large returns with no risk of loss."

Summary of this case from Sterner v. Penn

Opinion

93-2458.

October 6, 1994.

Appeal from M.D.N.C.


Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

Harrah v. Bradford Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 6, 1994
37 F.3d 1493 (4th Cir. 1994)

In Harrah v. J.C. Bradford Co., 37 F.3d 1493, 1994 WL 543528 (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 1994), an individual convinced several investors to allow him to invest their money in stock options, guaranteeing them "large returns with no risk of loss."

Summary of this case from Sterner v. Penn

applying N.C. law

Summary of this case from DeGorter v. Capitol Bancorp LTD
Case details for

Harrah v. Bradford Co.

Case Details

Full title:Harrah v. J.C. Bradford Co

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 6, 1994

Citations

37 F.3d 1493 (4th Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Trex Props. v. 25th St. Holding Co.

Notwithstanding its authority, when a plaintiff files a Rule 41(a)(2) motion for voluntary dismissal without…

Stretchline Intellectual Props. Ltd. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP

Notwithstanding its authority, when a plaintiff files a Rule 41(a)(2) motion for voluntary dismissal without…