Opinion
No. 12-1450
08-01-2012
SIDNEY B. HARR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD H. BRODHEAD; DAVID F. LEVI; DUKE UNIVERSITY, Defendants - Appellees.
Sidney B. Harr, Appellant Pro Se. Dixie Thomas Wells, ELLIS & WINTERS, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas David Schroeder, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00263-TDS-JEP)
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sidney B. Harr, Appellant Pro Se. Dixie Thomas Wells, ELLIS & WINTERS, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Sidney B. Harr appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant Defendant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss his complaint alleging Defendants violated his civil rights. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Harr's motion to schedule oral argument and affirm the district court's judgment. See Harr v. Brodhead, No. 1:11-cv-00263-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. March 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED