From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. United Services Automobile Asso.

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 23, 2010
Case No. SC10-1926 (Fla. Nov. 23, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. SC10-1926.

November 23, 2010.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 5D10-2289, 05-CA-401-15-W.


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 11 So. 2d 889, 890 (Fla. 1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill 415 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus "is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act"),approved, 431 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1983). All pending motions or other requests for relief are also hereby denied.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harper v. United Services Automobile Asso.

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 23, 2010
Case No. SC10-1926 (Fla. Nov. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Harper v. United Services Automobile Asso.

Case Details

Full title:VERA C. HARPER, ETC., Petitioner(s) v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 23, 2010

Citations

Case No. SC10-1926 (Fla. Nov. 23, 2010)