From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. United Nat. Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 9, 1993
626 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 93-923.

November 9, 1993.

An Appeal from a non-final order of the Circuit Court for Dade County; Ronald M. Friedman, Judge.

Harper Hewitt, and William Bruce Harper, Jr. and Robert G. Hewitt, Miami, for appellants.

Scharlin, Lanzetta and Cohen, and Lewis R. Cohen, Miami, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.


Appellants appeal a partial summary judgment determining liability in a mortgage foreclosure action. We affirm.

Summary judgment was properly entered in this case because there was no genuine issue of material fact on the issue of liability. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966). Appellants' affidavit in opposition to summary judgment established that they defaulted on the promissory note and mortgage by failing to pay the principal balance due upon maturity. On these undisputed facts, appellee, United National Bank, was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law on liability.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Harper v. United Nat. Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 9, 1993
626 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Harper v. United Nat. Bank

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BRUCE HARPER, JR., AND MELINDA C. HARPER, HIS WIFE, AND SARAH…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 9, 1993

Citations

626 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)