From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. Prudential Insurance of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1984
102 A.D.2d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

June 18, 1984


In an action to compel the defendant to pay over to plaintiff the proceeds of a life insurance policy, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Rubenfeld, J.), dated December 14, 1983, which denied her motion for reargument of a prior motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment, which had been denied, and a cross motion by the defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, which had been granted. ¶ Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. ¶ An order denying a motion for reargument is not appealable (see Mader v. Mader, 101 A.D.2d 881; Roberts v Connelly, 35 A.D.2d 813). Rubin, J.P., Boyers, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harper v. Prudential Insurance of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1984
102 A.D.2d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Harper v. Prudential Insurance of America

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN H. HARPER, Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1984

Citations

102 A.D.2d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Matter of McKee v. Coughlin

by the regulations (see, 7 NYCRR 251.5.1 [a]). Petitioner does not dispute that he was served with notice of…

Marsico v. Southland Corp.

Moreover, the cross motion is specious. The plaintiff's record on appeal properly included the April 6, 1987…