Opinion
No. 2:17-cv-02132-STA-cgc
02-20-2019
RODNEY HARPER, Plaintiff, v. TINA HOUSTON in her official and individual capacities, and DORIS WARREN in her Official and individual capacities, Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT
Before the Court is Plaintiff Rodney Harper's Motion for Contempt (ECF No. 38) and Motion for Hearing (ECF No. 39), both filed on May 7, 2018. The United States Magistrate Judge entered a report and recommendation on January 25, 2019, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt be denied. The Magistrate Judge also denied the Motion for Hearing. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, Plaintiff had fourteen (14) days from the service of the Magistrate Judge's report in which to file objections. Plaintiff did not object to the report, and the time for filing objections has now passed. Having reviewed the report and recommendation de novo, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to terminate Plaintiff's Motion for Hearing, which the Magistrate Judge denied on January 25, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ S. Thomas Anderson
S. THOMAS ANDERSON
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Date: February 20, 2019