From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. Harris Health Dep't

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 29, 2022
Civil Action H-22-1504 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 29, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action H-22-1504

07-29-2022

PHILIP HARPER, Inmate # 2838206 Plaintiff, v. HARRIS HEALTH DEPARTMENT, et al. Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION DISMISSING CASE

Lee H. Rosenthal Chief United States District Judge

Plaintiff Philip Harper, (Inmate #2838206), is a pretrial detainee in the Harris County Jail. He has filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, concerning alleged violations of his civil rights by the Harris County Sheriff's Office and the Harris County Health Department. (Docket Entry No. 1). He also filed an application for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, but he did not include a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). (Docket Entry No. 2).

On June 6, 2022, the court issued an order directing Harper to either pay the filing fee for a civil rights proceeding ($402.00) or submit a properly supported motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, including a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), within 30 days. (Docket Entry No. 4). Harper was warned that failure to comply as directed would result in a dismissal of this case without further notice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id.).

To date, Harper has not attempted to comply as directed and his time to do so has expired. Harper's failure to pursue this action forces the court to conclude that he lacks due diligence. Dismissal for want of prosecution is appropriate. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 1998) (a district court may on its own dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to comply with any court order).

Harper is advised that he may seek relief from this order under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure if he can show good cause for failing to comply with the court's order and local rules. Any motion under Rule 60(b) must be accompanied by a response to the court's June 6, 2022, order and either payment of the applicable filing fee or a properly supported application for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee that includes a certified inmate trust fund account statement in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

Harper's complaint, (Docket Entry No. 1), is dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.


Summaries of

Harper v. Harris Health Dep't

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 29, 2022
Civil Action H-22-1504 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Harper v. Harris Health Dep't

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP HARPER, Inmate # 2838206 Plaintiff, v. HARRIS HEALTH DEPARTMENT, et…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Jul 29, 2022

Citations

Civil Action H-22-1504 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 29, 2022)