From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harp v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Dec 9, 2015
NO. 09-14-00201-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 9, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 09-14-00201-CR

12-09-2015

BRUCE WAYNE HARP, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 253rd District Court Liberty County, Texas
Trial Cause No. CR30729

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found appellant Bruce Wayne Harp guilty of continuous sexual abuse of a child and assessed punishment at thirty-five years imprisonment with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's Institutional Division. Harp timely filed a notice of appeal.

Harp's appellate counsel filed an Anders brief. See Anders v. California., 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel's brief presents his professional evaluation of the record and concludes there are no arguable grounds to be advanced in this appeal. Counsel provided Harp with a copy of the brief. We granted an extension of time for Harp to file a pro se brief. Harp filed a pro se brief raising a number of issues on appeal.

The appellate court need not address the merits of issues raised in Anders briefs or pro se responses. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). In these circumstances, we "may determine that the appeal is wholly frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that [the appellate court] has reviewed the record and finds no reversible error. Or, [we] may determine that arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief the issues." Id. (citations omitted).

We have independently reviewed the clerk's record and the reporter's record, and we agree with Harp's appellate counsel that no arguable issues support an appeal. See id. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief Harp's appeal. See id.; cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment.

Harp may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68. --------

AFFIRMED.

/s/_________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice Submitted on September 8, 2015
Opinion Delivered December 9, 2015
Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

Harp v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Dec 9, 2015
NO. 09-14-00201-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Harp v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE WAYNE HARP, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Dec 9, 2015

Citations

NO. 09-14-00201-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 9, 2015)

Citing Cases

Ex parte Harp

The Ninth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Harp v. State, No. 09-14-00201-CR (Tex. App. — Beaumont,…