From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harp v. Austin

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 29, 2022
No. 21-12446 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2022)

Opinion

21-12446

03-29-2022

ANTHONY HARP, Plaintiff, v. KRISTINE AUSTIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MARCH 1, 2022 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [21]

Nancy G. Edmunds, United States District Judge

This is a pro se prisoner civil rights lawsuit filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Plaintiff Anthony Harp alleging violations of the Eighth Amendment, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act. (ECF No. 1.) The case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey for all pre-trial matters. (ECF No. 6.) The remaining defendants are Kristine Austin, Sirena Landfair, JCF Healthcare staff, and Corizon Health, Inc. Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation to construe Plaintiff's motion to dismiss JCF Healthcare staff (ECF No. 19) as a notice of voluntary dismissal of those parties. (ECF No. 21.) No party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge's report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” See Hall v. Rawal, No. 09-10933, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120541, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). Nonetheless, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. The Court, therefore, ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the report and recommendation (ECF No. 21). Accordingly, JCF Healthcare staff are DISMISSED from this matter.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harp v. Austin

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 29, 2022
No. 21-12446 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Harp v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY HARP, Plaintiff, v. KRISTINE AUSTIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 29, 2022

Citations

No. 21-12446 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2022)