From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haroco Company, Inc. v. Sahim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 1952
279 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

February 26, 1952.

Present — Peck, P.J., Dore, Cohn, Shientag and Bergan, JJ.


The second cause pleaded in the complaint fails to state facts showing actionable fraud. No misrepresentation of any existing fact upon which plaintiff placed any reliance to its disadvantage is attributed in this part of the complaint to appellant Irevani, and the acts of his agent are stated in equivocal form. Order unanimously modified by granting that part of the motion addressed to the second cause of action, and by dismissing the second cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Haroco Company, Inc. v. Sahim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 1952
279 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Haroco Company, Inc. v. Sahim

Case Details

Full title:HAROCO COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. ABRAHAM SAHIM, Individually and Doing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 26, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)