From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haro v. John Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 9, 2016
CASE NO. CV 13-4887-PSG(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 13-4887-PSG (PJW)

12-09-2016

JOHNNY JOE HARO, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE 1, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion for summary judgment, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted.

DATED:12/9/16

/s/_________

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Haro v. John Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 9, 2016
CASE NO. CV 13-4887-PSG(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Haro v. John Doe

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY JOE HARO, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE 1, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 9, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. CV 13-4887-PSG(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2016)

Citing Cases

Howard v. Hildebrand

See Haro v. McEwen, No. CV 13-4887-PSG (PJW), 2016 WL 7187626, at *2 n.1 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2016)…