From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harnish v. Carbonell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 2, 1976
328 So. 2d 489 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-375.

March 2, 1976.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court, Monroe County, Bill G. Chappell, J.

Edward B. Johnson, Jr., Key West, for appellant.

Feldman Eden, Key West, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and NATHAN, JJ.


This is an appeal from a final judgment granting specific performance and damages to appellees for breach of contract in an action arising out of appellant's failure to pay rent in accordance with the terms of a lease and his refusal to reassign and retransfer the alcoholic beverage license from the State of Florida, which appellant was to hold in trust during the pendency of the lease on the bar premises to be used as a cocktail lounge, as provided for in a trust agreement entered into by the parties.

In essence the appellant's defenses to the action at trial were that the trust agreement was for the purpose of circumventing the laws of Florida and that the trust agreement was against public policy, therefore, void and of no effect. On the issue of damages appellant's defense was that the appellees had failed to mitigate their damages.

The issues were tried non jury by the Circuit Court of Monroe County and resulted in the findings and judgment in favor of the appellees.

Appellant contends that he was entitled to prevail on these defenses. We cannot agree.

The points relied upon by the appellant for reversal have been carefully considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and we find no reversible error has been shown. City of Miami Beach v. Fein, Fla.App. 1972, 263 So.2d 258; Heredia v. Industrial Supplies, Inc., of Florida, Fla.App. 1972, 265 So.2d 709; Mesick v. Loeser, Fla.App. 1975, 311 So.2d 132; Peacock v. Carver, Fla.App. 1975, 315 So.2d 214. The record discloses the case was fully and fairly tried; that the judgment is supported by the evidence and that the several rulings of the trial court challenged by appellant, did not, on the record and under the law, constitute harmful error.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Harnish v. Carbonell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 2, 1976
328 So. 2d 489 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Harnish v. Carbonell

Case Details

Full title:STACEY L. HARNISH, APPELLANT, v. CECIL CARBONELL AND LOUISE CARBONELL, HIS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 2, 1976

Citations

328 So. 2d 489 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Cade

Rather, the purpose of the statute is to apprise the Beverage Department of the ownership and management of…

Nico Membiela Supper Club, Inc. v. Lanier, Chapleau & Jones, Inc.

Affirmed. See Wright v. Cade, 349 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Harnish v. Carbonell, 328 So.2d 489 (Fla. 3d…