From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harned v. Henderson

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 29, 1976
535 F.2d 1399 (2d Cir. 1976)

Summary

vacating and remanding to the district court in light of a new Supreme Court decision

Summary of this case from Utah v. Su

Opinion

No. 908, Docket 75-2146.

Argued April 6, 1976.

Decided June 29, 1976.

Jeffrey I. Zuckerman, New York City, for petitioner-appellant.

Ralph L. McMurry, Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. for the State of New York, New York City, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from an order of Hon. Orrin G. Judd, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Vacated and remanded in light of Henderson v. Morgan, ___ U.S. ___, 96 S.Ct. 2253, 49 L.Ed.2d 108 (1976).

Before ANDERSON, MULLIGAN and MESKILL, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from an order of the Hon. Orrin G. Judd, Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, entered on October 17, 1975, which dismissed appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We vacate and remand in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Henderson v. Morgan, ___ U.S. ___, 96 S.Ct. 2253, 49 L.Ed.2d 108, 44 U.S.L.W. 4910, 19 Crim.L.Rep. 3133 (1976), aff'g 516 F.2d 897 (2d Cir., 1975). There the Court held that a guilty plea cannot be voluntary (and hence is violative of due process) unless the defendant was informed by court or counsel of the elements of the offense to which he pleads. In the instant case the petitioner pleaded guilty in state court to burglary in the first degree, one element of which is the causation of physical injury. N.Y. Penal Law § 140.30(2). While Judge Judd below determined that petitioner never admitted the commission of actual physical injury, the record before us does not indicate whether or not Harned was advised of all the elements of burglary in the first degree. Accordingly we will vacate and remand for further consideration in light of Morgan.

Such an admission is itself not necessarily required for a valid guilty plea; see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970).


Summaries of

Harned v. Henderson

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 29, 1976
535 F.2d 1399 (2d Cir. 1976)

vacating and remanding to the district court in light of a new Supreme Court decision

Summary of this case from Utah v. Su
Case details for

Harned v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD H. HARNED, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ROBERT J. HENDERSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jun 29, 1976

Citations

535 F.2d 1399 (2d Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Utah v. Su

w change."); Harrison v. Dyson, 492 F.2d 1162, 1163 (5th Cir. 1974) (vacating and remanding because the…

Harned v. Henderson

On June 29, 1976, we vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in…