From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harmon v. Vanderbilt Hotel Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 1894
39 N.E. 21 (N.Y. 1894)

Opinion

Argued October 8, 1894

Decided October 23, 1894

J. Newton Fiero for appellant.

H.D. Birdsall for respondent.


Agree to affirm order, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer within twenty days upon payment of costs; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Harmon v. Vanderbilt Hotel Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 1894
39 N.E. 21 (N.Y. 1894)
Case details for

Harmon v. Vanderbilt Hotel Company

Case Details

Full title:CLARA HARMON, Respondent, v . VANDERBILT HOTEL COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 23, 1894

Citations

39 N.E. 21 (N.Y. 1894)
143 N.Y. 665
63 N.Y. St. Rptr. 865

Citing Cases

Doyle v. W.L. Douglas Shoe Company

March, 1904. Interlocutory judgment modified by inserting provision therein allowing plaintiff costs of the…

Abra Holding Corp. v. Jackson

Rule 93 of the Rules of Civil Practice provides that such an allegation must be included where the plaintiff…