From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harmon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jun 2, 1998
968 S.W.2d 266 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72791

Order Filed: June 2, 1998

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE JULIAN L. BUSH.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for movant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon; Atty. Gen., Barbara K. Chesser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Paul J. Simon and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.



ORDER


Marvin Harmon (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court erred in denying him an evidentiary hearing because his trial counsel was ineffective in: (1) mistakenly advising Movant that if he pled guilty he would not be subjected to either an 85 percent minimum prison term or sex offender registration; and (2) failing to pursue a mental evaluation which would have shown Movant was not mentally fit to plead guilty and waive his right to trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The motion court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Harmon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jun 2, 1998
968 S.W.2d 266 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Harmon v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN HARMON, MOVANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR

Date published: Jun 2, 1998

Citations

968 S.W.2d 266 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)