From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harmon v. Mack

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 10-4053 LHK (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-4053 LHK (PR)

11-22-2011

TYSHON MALEKE HARMON, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR RICHARD MACK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO HAVE SALINAS VALLEY STATE

PRISON PROVIDE ADDRESSES ON RECORD; DISMISSING

UNSERVED DEFENDANTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE


(Docket No. 74)

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that various Salinas Valley State Prison ("SVSP") officials violated his constitutional rights. On May 24, 2011 the Court issued its first order directing Plaintiff to locate and provide sufficient location information for five unserved Defendants so that the United States Marshal could effect service on them. On October 6, 2011, after a series of requests for extension of time, and motions for the Court to compel others to produce addresses, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel Salinas Valley State Prison to provide the addresses on record of the unserved Defendants. In this circuit, if the Marshal is unable to effectuate service through no fault of his own because the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient information, or because the defendant is not where plaintiff alleges, and the plaintiff is informed of this lack of information, plaintiff must seek to remedy the situation or face dismissal. See Walker v. Sumner, 14 f.3d 1415, 1421-22 (9th Cir. 1994), overruled on other grounds by Sandin v. Connor, 515 U.S. 472 (1995) (prisoner failed to show cause why prison official should not be dismissed under Rule 4(m) because prisoner did not prove that he provided Marshal with sufficient information to serve official or that he requested that official be served). Thus, Plaintiff's motion to compel is DENIED.

On September 19, 2011, the court issued an order granting Plaintiff one more extension of time to locate the unserved Defendants. The Court cautioned Plaintiff that he "must provide the Court with accurate and sufficient information for Defendants Kachare, Remington, Bowman, Rodriguez, and Moses such that the Marshal is able to effect service upon them," or face dismissal of those Defendants. More than thirty days from the date of that order have passed, and Plaintiff has not provided the Court with any further identifying or location information for any of the five unserved Defendants.

Accordingly, Defendants Kachare, Remington, Bowman, Rodriguez, and Moses are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Harmon v. Mack

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 10-4053 LHK (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Harmon v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:TYSHON MALEKE HARMON, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR RICHARD MACK, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-4053 LHK (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)