From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harmon v. Johnson

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Dec 17, 2007
NO. 4:06cv00740 GTE (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2007)

Opinion

NO. 4:06cv00740 GTE.

December 17, 2007


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition received from Magistrate Judge Jerry Cavaneau and the objections filed in response, and has further reviewed the relevant record de novo. The Findings and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings.

Accordingly, Defendant Dr. Carl Johnson's motion for summary judgment (docket entry #67) is hereby granted and Plaintiff's case is dismissed in its entirety. Dismissal against Defendant Carl Johnson is with prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order adopting the recommendations, and any judgment entered hereunder, would not be taken in good faith. Further, this dismissal counts as a "strike" as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harmon v. Johnson

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Dec 17, 2007
NO. 4:06cv00740 GTE (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Harmon v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:HENRY A. HARMON PLAINTIFF ADC #103609 v. DR. CARL JOHNSON, et al DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: Dec 17, 2007

Citations

NO. 4:06cv00740 GTE (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2007)

Citing Cases

Dumel v. Westchester Cnty.

While no court in the Second Circuit has addressed the question, courts in other circuits have found that a…

Dumel v. Westchester Cnty.

SeePlumes v. Quinlan, 980 F.2d 738, 1992 WL 355504, at *2 (Memorandum Opinion) (9th Cir. 1992) (concluding…