From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HARMON v. HAMILTON BEACH/PROCTOR-SILEX, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 10, 1999
258 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 10, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Scudder, J. — Discovery.

Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in failing to grant in its entirety the motion of defendant to compel plaintiffs to comply with its notice to produce. Plaintiffs incorrectly relied on CPLR 3101 (d) (1) and (2) as authority for the assertion that the documents requested are privileged. The documents in question, prepared by third parties and obtained by plaintiffs' attorney, are neither privileged documents involving expert testimony nor materials prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial. We thus modify the order by granting in its entirety defendant's motion.


Summaries of

HARMON v. HAMILTON BEACH/PROCTOR-SILEX, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 10, 1999
258 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

HARMON v. HAMILTON BEACH/PROCTOR-SILEX, INC

Case Details

Full title:LESLIE HARMON et al., Respondents, v. HAMILTON BEACH/PROCTOR-SILEX, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 542

Citing Cases

Salzer v. Farm Family Life Insurance Co.

While it is true, as defendants point out, that neither Forquer nor Denue signed the written statements…