From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harman v. Konteh

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Mar 13, 1998
No. 98-T-0021 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 13, 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-T-0021.

Released March 13, 1998.

Appeal from Trumbull County.


Petition dismissed. See Per Curiam Opinion and Judgment Entry. (FORD) (NADER) (O'NEILL)

EXTRAORDINARY WRITS:

An allegation of a non-jurisdictional error by a trial court does not state a viable basis for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Specifically, any question as to whether the trial court adhered to the provisions of Crim.R. 11 in accepting petitioner's guilty pleas should have been raised in direct appeal.


Summaries of

Harman v. Konteh

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Mar 13, 1998
No. 98-T-0021 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 13, 1998)
Case details for

Harman v. Konteh

Case Details

Full title:DONALD A. HARMAN, Petitioner, v. CHELLEH KONTEH, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio

Date published: Mar 13, 1998

Citations

No. 98-T-0021 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 13, 1998)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Griffin v. Wilson

Id. at 118.' Harman v. Konteh * * * (Mar. 13, 1998), Trumbull App. No. 98-T-0021, unreported. "Applying the…

Smith v. State

{¶ 6} As a basic proposition, a writ of habeas corpus will only lie to compel the release of an inmate when…