From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harling v. Bache Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 28, 1963
18 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

February 28, 1963

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: For the purpose of passing upon the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, we take account of the third-party defendant's answer and affidavit. However, we do not at this time pass upon the sufficiency of the original defendant's answer to enable it to raise the defense of the delivery of the securities to the holder of paramount title ( Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N.Y. 267, 272; 5 N.Y. Jur., Bailment, §§ 31, 76; 4 Am. Jur., Pl. and Pr. Forms No. 4:128.).


Summaries of

Harling v. Bache Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 28, 1963
18 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Harling v. Bache Co.

Case Details

Full title:EILEEN M. HARLING, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of VIRGINIA R…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 28, 1963

Citations

18 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
238 N.Y.S.2d 494