Opinion
No. 67217
02-13-2015
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Having considered this original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court's order denying a motion to intervene in a subrogation action, we conclude that extraordinary relief is not warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); see Dangberg Holdings Nev., L.L.C. v. Douglas Cnty., 115 Nev. 129, 141, 978 P.2d 311, 318 (1999) (explaining that the timeliness of a motion to intervene is a matter within the sound discretion of the district court).
It is so ORDERED.
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge
Patrick N. Chapin
Murchison & Cumming, LLC/Las Vegas
Cisneros & Marias
Eighth District Court Clerk