From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harley v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2015
No. 67217 (Nev. Feb. 13, 2015)

Opinion

No. 67217

02-13-2015

ALICE HARLEY, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ADRIANA ESCOBAR, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF HORACE MANN COMPANIES; AND GAUGHAN SOUTH LLC, D/B/A SOUTH POINT HOTEL AND CASINO, Real Parties in Interest.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Having considered this original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court's order denying a motion to intervene in a subrogation action, we conclude that extraordinary relief is not warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); see Dangberg Holdings Nev., L.L.C. v. Douglas Cnty., 115 Nev. 129, 141, 978 P.2d 311, 318 (1999) (explaining that the timeliness of a motion to intervene is a matter within the sound discretion of the district court).

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge

Patrick N. Chapin

Murchison & Cumming, LLC/Las Vegas

Cisneros & Marias

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Harley v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 13, 2015
No. 67217 (Nev. Feb. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Harley v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

Case Details

Full title:ALICE HARLEY, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 13, 2015

Citations

No. 67217 (Nev. Feb. 13, 2015)