From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harley v. Agostini

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 16, 2003
Civil No. 99-1481 (JRT/RLE) (D. Minn. Sep. 16, 2003)

Opinion

Civil No. 99-1481 (JRT/RLE)

September 16, 2003

Alan M. Sandals and John R Grogan, SANDALS LANGER, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiffs

Seymour J. Mansfield, MANSFIELD, TANICK COHEN, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for plaintiffs

John D. French, FAEGRE BENSON LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for defendants

Steven L. Severson, FAEGRE BENSON LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for defendants

Deborah A. Ellingboe, FAEGRE BENSON LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for defendants

Paul Martin Wolff, WILLIAMS CONNOLLY, Washington, D.C., for defendants

J. Alan Galbraith, WILLIAMS CONNOLLY, Washington, D.C., for defendants


ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 60(B)


This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs' motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). The Court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment by Order dated December 7, 2000, and the clerk entered judgment in favor of defendants on the same date. Based on the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) [Docket No. 27] is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Court's Order denying the identical motion plaintiffs filed in Harley v. Minnesota Mining Mfg. Co., Civil No. 4-96-488.


Summaries of

Harley v. Agostini

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 16, 2003
Civil No. 99-1481 (JRT/RLE) (D. Minn. Sep. 16, 2003)
Case details for

Harley v. Agostini

Case Details

Full title:CAROL HARLEY, LENORA BANASZEWSKI, MICHAEL PAYTON, and RICHARD ZOESCH…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Sep 16, 2003

Citations

Civil No. 99-1481 (JRT/RLE) (D. Minn. Sep. 16, 2003)