From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harlander v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 8, 2011
Case No.: 1:10-cv-01970 JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01970 JLT.

August 8, 2011


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 18)


Parties have stipulated by counsel for Defendant to have an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. (Doc. 18). The Scheduling Order allows a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties. (Doc. 7 at 4). Notably, a thirty-day extension was granted on April 11, 2011, for the plaintiff to submit a confidential brief. (Doc. 13). At that time, the Court set deadlines for the opening brief to be filed by July 5, 2011, and the opposition by August 5, 2011. Id. Defendant's counsel asserts a second extension is necessary due to her workload and office leave. (Doc. 18 at 1-2).

Good cause appearing, Defendant is granted a thirty-day extension, and shall file a responsive brief by September 5, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 6, 2011


Summaries of

Harlander v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 8, 2011
Case No.: 1:10-cv-01970 JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Harlander v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL HARLANDER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 8, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01970 JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)