From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harkins v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 2, 1975
221 S.E.2d 207 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

51084.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 4, 1975.

DECIDED OCTOBER 2, 1975. REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 28, 1975.

Dispossessory warrant. Cobb State Court. Before Judge Robinson.

M. David Harrison, David A. Webster, for appellant.

Donald O. Nelson, for appellee.


In this dispossessory proceeding predicated on nonpayment of rent, the tenant appeals from an adverse judgment.

1. "Prerequisite to the right to seek a dispossessory warrant is a demand for possession of property by the landlord. Code § 61-301." Terrell v. Griffith, 129 Ga. App. 675, 677 ( 200 S.E.2d 485). Relying upon this principle, tenant contends landlord failed to show that this prerequisite demand for the premises was made. Thus, tenant continues, the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment. We disagree. Landlord introduced in evidence a letter calling upon tenant to pay the two months rent then due or be "removed" under a dispossessory warrant. Landlord testified this letter was mailed to tenant. The denial of tenant's motion was therefore not erroneous. See Bussell v. Swift, 50 Ga. App. 148 ( 177 S.E. 277).

2. Tenant's assertion that this demand letter was inadmissible is without merit. The rules governing the admissibility of business records apply to letters made in the regular course of business. See 32 CJS 976, Evidence § 703.

3. The Supreme Court disposed of the remaining enumeration of error by transferring the appeal to this court.

Judgment affirmed. Pannell, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 4, 1975 — DECIDED OCTOBER 2, 1975 — REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 28, 1975 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Harkins v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 2, 1975
221 S.E.2d 207 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Harkins v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:HARKINS v. BOYD

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 2, 1975

Citations

221 S.E.2d 207 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
221 S.E.2d 207

Citing Cases

Metro Management Co. v. Parker

However, a termination of the tenancy is not required in order for the landlord to recover possession because…