From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harkavy v. Bay State Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 17, 1958
13 Misc. 2d 437 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)

Opinion

June 17, 1958

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, S. REYMART ALTER, J.

Max Schulman and Bernard Meyerson for appellant.

William S. Simons for respondent.


The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $10 costs to the plaintiff, and defendant's motion to open its default and vacate the judgment entered thereon denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers. The defendant failed to submit an affidavit factually sufficient to show that it has a meritorious defense to the action ( Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562).

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Harkavy v. Bay State Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jun 17, 1958
13 Misc. 2d 437 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
Case details for

Harkavy v. Bay State Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HARKAVY, Appellant, v. BAY STATE MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1958

Citations

13 Misc. 2d 437 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
180 N.Y.S.2d 612

Citing Cases

Jormar Constr, Inc v. Tinawi

"[t]he favor of the court should be extended upon proper terms when the litigant who has a meritorious cause…