Opinion
2021-07440
12-23-2021
IN THE MATTER OF DELBERT W. HARGIS, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. VICTORIA ANN PRITTY-PITCHER, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. IN THE MATTER OF VICTORIA ANN PRITTY-PITCHER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, DELBERT W. HARGIS, JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND NICOLE E. HARGIS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. IN THE MATTER OF VICTORIA ANN PRITTY-PITCHER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, DELBERT W. HARGIS, JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
AMBER R. POULOS, WILLIAMSVILLE, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. KELLY WHITE DONOFRIO LLP, ROCHESTER (DONALD A. WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT VICTORIA ANN PRITTY-PITCHER AND PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. EILEEN PERRY, FALMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT NICOLE E. HARGIS. KIMBERLY A. WOOD, WATERTOWN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.
AMBER R. POULOS, WILLIAMSVILLE, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
KELLY WHITE DONOFRIO LLP, ROCHESTER (DONALD A. WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT VICTORIA ANN PRITTY-PITCHER AND PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
EILEEN PERRY, FALMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT NICOLE E. HARGIS.
KIMBERLY A. WOOD, WATERTOWN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County (Peter A. Schwerzmann, A.J.), entered December 11, 2020 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, denied the petitions seeking modification of a prior custody order.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.