Opinion
01 Civ. 7515 (LAK)
June 26, 2002
ORDER
By order dated June 12, 2002, the Court struck plaintiff's (fourth) amended complaint and gave him until June 21, 2002 to file an amendment to the third amended complaint "repleading ONLY the first and tenth claims for relief . . ."
Plaintiff responded to the June 12, 2002 order by filing a document labelled Amendment to Third Amended Complaint and Jury Demand. The so-called amendment, however, is a complete complaint containing ten claims for relief. It therefore is not what the Court had in mind and, depending upon whether the document alters any part of the former complaint other than the first and tenth claims for relief, may violate the June 12, 2002 order.
In order to assist the Court and defendants in determining just what plaintiff has done, plaintiff is directed to serve and file, on or before July 2, 2002, a redlined copy of the so-called amendment indicating all changes as compared with the third amended complaint that was the subject of the Court's decision on defendants' motions.