From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HARE v. FREDERICK FIGGE COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1910
138 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

May, 1910.


Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the record does not disclose evidence sufficient to show negligence on the part of the defendant. Jenks, Burr, Thomas, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

HARE v. FREDERICK FIGGE COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1910
138 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

HARE v. FREDERICK FIGGE COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:Georgiana Hare, Respondent, v. Frederick Figge Company, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1910

Citations

138 App. Div. 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)