From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hare v. Cottrell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Jun 26, 2019
CV 18-116-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Jun. 26, 2019)

Opinion

CV 18-116-BLG-SPW

06-26-2019

ALBERT HARE, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH RAYMOND COTTRELL and ALLAN KITTERMAN, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The United States Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations on June 3, 2019. (Doc. 10). The Magistrate recommended the Court dismiss the case for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 10 at 2).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this Court does not find that the Magistrate committed clear error.

IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 10) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:

1. This case is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter and enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to have the docket that the Court certifies pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to have the docket reflect that this dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Mr. Hare failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

DATED this 26th day of June, 2019.

/s/_________

SUSAN P. WATTERS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hare v. Cottrell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Jun 26, 2019
CV 18-116-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Jun. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Hare v. Cottrell

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT HARE, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH RAYMOND COTTRELL and ALLAN KITTERMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 26, 2019

Citations

CV 18-116-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Jun. 26, 2019)