From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HARE CHASE, INC. v. BIGGS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

March, 1927.


Order granting defendant's motion to set aside verdict and for a new trial unless plaintiff stipulates for a reduction of said verdict, affirmed, with costs; and plaintiff refusing to so stipulate, a new trial of the action is granted. No opinion. Kelly, P.J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

HARE CHASE, INC. v. BIGGS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

HARE CHASE, INC. v. BIGGS

Case Details

Full title:HARE CHASE, INC., Appellant, v. AMZA W. BIGGS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1927

Citations

219 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)