Hardy v. State

Full title: MELVIN HARDY, APPELLANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR

Date published: Mar 10, 1998

963 S.W.2d 475 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72630

Opinion Filed: March 10, 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court, City of St. Louis; Thomas J. Frawley, Judge.

David Hemingway, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J. and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. He concedes his motion was filed out of time. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); State v. Blankenship, 830 S.W.2d 1, 16 (Mo. banc 1992). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).