From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardy v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 16, 2017
Case No. ED CV 16-2199 FMO (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 16-2199 FMO (JCG)

08-16-2017

ANTWON LEE HARDY, Petitioner, v. D. PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. // // //

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. DATED: August 16, 2017

/s/_________

HON. FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hardy v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 16, 2017
Case No. ED CV 16-2199 FMO (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Hardy v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:ANTWON LEE HARDY, Petitioner, v. D. PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 16, 2017

Citations

Case No. ED CV 16-2199 FMO (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2017)