From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardy v. MGM Grand Detroit

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 13, 2006
477 Mich. 966 (Mich. 2006)

Opinion

No. 131656.

December 13, 2006.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals No. 267550.


Summary Dispositions December 13, 2006.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the order of the Court of Appeals and we reinstate the order of the Workers' Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC). MCL 418.861a(5) requires that a party seeking review file a transcript of the hearing with the commission within 60 days, but permits an extension of time for "sufficient cause shown." The WCAC unanimously concluded that defendant failed to establish sufficient cause for the failure to timely file the transcript. The Court of Appeals erred in setting aside the WCAC's factual determination, which is conclusive in the absence of fraud. MCL 418.861a(14); Mudel v Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co, 462 Mich 691 (2000). See also Marshall v D J Jacobetti Veterans Facility (After Remand), 447 Mich 544 (1994).

KELLY, J. I would grant leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Hardy v. MGM Grand Detroit

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 13, 2006
477 Mich. 966 (Mich. 2006)
Case details for

Hardy v. MGM Grand Detroit

Case Details

Full title:SHERLENE M. HARDY, PLAINTIFF-Appellant, v. MGM GRAND DETROIT, L.L.C.…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 13, 2006

Citations

477 Mich. 966 (Mich. 2006)
724 N.W.2d 467