From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardy v. Laurels of Carson City, L.L.C.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 6, 2016
SC: 150882 (Mich. May. 6, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 150882

05-06-2016

CYNTHIA HARDY, Personal Representative of the Estate of MARGARET MARIE ROUSH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LAURELS OF CARSON CITY, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 317406
Montcalm CC: 2012-016830-CZ

On April 7, 2016, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 6, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Hardy v. Laurels of Carson City, L.L.C.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 6, 2016
SC: 150882 (Mich. May. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Hardy v. Laurels of Carson City, L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA HARDY, Personal Representative of the Estate of MARGARET MARIE…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: May 6, 2016

Citations

SC: 150882 (Mich. May. 6, 2016)