From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardy v. Lappin

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 23, 2011
CRIMINAL NO. 1:11-CR-0457 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 23, 2011)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 1:11-CR-0457.

June 23, 2011


ORDER


We are considering the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Smyser. The plaintiff has filed objections to the report and requests the appointment of counsel. He is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and has filed a complaint for damages arising from medical treatment of a tumor on his leg.

Judge Smyser's report sets forth in detail the demanding legal requirements for an eighth amendment claim involving medical care and treatment. As noted by Judge Smyser, a plaintiff must show that a defendant was "deliberately indifferent" to his need for medical treatment. We agree with Judge Smyser that plaintiff has stated at most a claim for negligence or malpractice. The actions of prison and medical personnel in this case do not rise to the level of deliberate indifference, as outlined in Judge Smyser's thorough report. Plaintiff's objections to the report merely restate the allegations of his complaint and form no basis to reject the report.

Pursuant to the recommendation of Judge Smyser it is ordered that plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. The Clerk shall close this file.


Summaries of

Hardy v. Lappin

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 23, 2011
CRIMINAL NO. 1:11-CR-0457 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Hardy v. Lappin

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM HARDY, Plaintiff v. HARLEY LAPPIN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 23, 2011

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 1:11-CR-0457 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 23, 2011)