From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardy v. Headly

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 9, 2022
22-CV-3203 (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-3203 (BCM)

12-09-2022

COREY HARDY, Plaintiff, v. SWABY ALVA HEADLY., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

BARBARA MOSES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

The Court having been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without costs and without prejudice to the parties' right, within thirty days of the date of this Order, (a) to submit their own Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal for the Court to so order, or (b) to reopen the case and restore it to the active calendar if the settlement has not been completed. To be clear, any application to reopen and restore must be filed within thirty days of the date of this Order . Late-filed applications may be denied solely on that basis.

This Order shall be deemed a final dismissal of the action with prejudice in the event that no party requests restoration of the case to the active calendar within such 30-day period.

Any pending motions are moot. All filing deadlines and conference dates are adjourned sine die. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hardy v. Headly

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 9, 2022
22-CV-3203 (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Hardy v. Headly

Case Details

Full title:COREY HARDY, Plaintiff, v. SWABY ALVA HEADLY., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 9, 2022

Citations

22-CV-3203 (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2022)