From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardy v. Adelson

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 16, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00636-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-00636-RLH-GWF.

August 16, 2011


ORDER Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Complaint (#41)


This matter is before the Court on Defendant Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint (#41), filed on August 15, 2011.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b) and LR 6, extensions of time may be granted for good cause. Defendant Las Vegas Sands requests that the Court extend the time to file a response to Plaintiff's shareholder derivative complaint for all served and unserved Defendants so that the Court might first rule on the pending motion to consolidate cases (#19). Defendant represents that Plaintiff does not oppose this enlargement of time. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint (#41) is granted. All served and unserved Defendants shall have forty (40) days from the date the Court issues a decision on the pending motion to consolidate cases (#19) to file a response to Plaintiff's shareholder derivative complaint.


Summaries of

Hardy v. Adelson

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 16, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00636-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Hardy v. Adelson

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN HARDY, Plaintiff, v. SHELDON GARY ADELSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Aug 16, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-00636-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2011)