From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardwick v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 27, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-310 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-310 Erie.

March 27, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on October 20, 2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on March 7, 2006, recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed and a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail at SCI Albion, where he is incarcerated, and on Respondent. Petitioner has filed no objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report and Recommendation. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2006,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED and that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on March 7, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Hardwick v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 27, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-310 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Hardwick v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:FREEMAN HARDWICK, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT BROOKS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 27, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-310 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 27, 2006)

Citing Cases

Louisiana Western Lumber Co. v. Stanford

Appellant contends that even if the return on the original writ of fieri facias was erroneous and subject to…